Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
Global Environmental Governance: Elements of a Reform Agenda
Earth System Governance - The Challenge for Social Science
Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
What Amazonia Does the World Need?
The Challenge of Environmental Governance
On the Road to Rio+20 - Proposals for a Citizen Project
"Biocivilization" for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet. Video on the Workshop
Biocivilization for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet - Workshop
Proposals for a New World Governance
Rethinking and Changing World Governance
Proposals for a Fair and Democratic Architecture of Power
Rio+20 and Beyond. No Future without Justice
A new historical moment?
Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development
Rio+20: Failed Diplomacy, Feeble Democracy
The Commons and World Governance
Dialog of Chinese, European, and South American Civil Societies at Rio+20
Call to Multiply the Village of Alternatives
3rd Dialogue Meeting between civil societies from China, Europe and South America
Towards a Global Political-Economic Architecture of Environmental Space
Universal Declaration of Emerging Human Rights
The Future of the Commons
After Copenhagen, Some Light on the Horizon
Henceforth, the Keys to the Future are Responsibility, Solidarity, and Courage
Inventing a New World Governance Now
Regulating Transnational Companies: 46 Proposals
WGI: World Governance Index (2009 Report)
Political and Institutional Governance
Civil Society Politics Manifesto
What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?
The Future of Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Law
World Charter of Free Media
Statement No. 1
Mobilize and organize to Stop and Prevent Planet Fever!
The Emergence of Global Administrative Law
For Climate Justice and a World Fit to Be Lived in
Marrakech Process for the Protection and Promotion of All Human Rights of Migrants and Persons in Transnational Mobility
As the COP 21 is in full throttle, let me reflect briefly on a unique historical event that in some ways resembled the predicament we find ourselves in today. One might call it the “Westphalian Moment.”
To disparage any misunderstanding, let me first make a distinction between this and what has been known as the Westphalian Order, whose revival I am not advocating in the least sense. The Westphalian Order that came about at the end of the Thirty Year War in 1648 and died a century ago in 1914 was established for a world that has all but vanished. Today, it would prove an anachronistic solution with little bearing on our current state of affairs.
That being said, the manner by which its architects reinvented a Europe at the brink of collapse is something that today’s Paris negotiators might be well advised to emulate as they try to make a historical breakthrough to repel the disastrous contribution made by human activity on climate change. Much like today, though on a continental rather than a global scale, the European horizon seemed as bleak as it ever had been in 1648. The thirty year conflict that had originated in religious violence between Protestants and Catholics had spiraled out of control. It had left millions dead and much of the region in economic ruin. It would take Germany, where a majority of the violence had taken place, a century to recover economically and demographically. Yet, despite all the destruction, all the resentments, all the despair, a few pugnacious and courageous individuals managed to pull off a diplomatic miracle. This miracle is what I call the Westphalian Moment.
With the treaties negotiated in Westphalia, religious violence was completely flushed out of the equation, international law was established and efficient mechanisms were put in place to prevent another massive conflagration. Though Europe relapsed with the double punch of the French Revolution and Napoleonic imperialism, the first Westphalian order lasted a century and a half during which the Enlightenment was able to emerge and flourish. Less successful but not altogether unworthy, the second Westphalian order (1815 – 1914) still managed to reorganize the continent after the deeply disruptive Napoleonic adventure. Today, the world is once more at the brink, as Europe was in the first half of the 17th century. Though the threat is less palpable perhaps, especially in the developing world, it is nonetheless as menacing for humankind, if not more, than the religious wars of the time. For today, the threat is not only global: it transcends the welfare of humanity to affect the planet and everything that is a part of it.
Why then, when so many such negotiations fail, did the Westphalian ones succeed? It is my conviction that the main reason lies in the fact that the Westphalian diplomatswere invariably guided by a high moral sense of responsibility, animated that they were by the sentiment that they had a moral duty to protect humanity. True, political maneuvering played its part in the negotiations, as did power arm twisting and political opportunism. But in the end, the idea that won the day was that one had just gone too far and something drastic had to be done about it. History holds few moments like these when a sudden collective push can steer humanity away from suicide and back on its tracks. Today is such a moment. May this be our Westphalian moment.