Managing Territories, Cities, and the Rural World
Securing Common Property in a Globalizing World
Territories and Globalization: The Stakes of Development
Thirty years of Habitat I: no more neoliberal model of cities!
“Guadalajara Declaration on the future of the city”. A Proposal
Rural Areas and World Governance
An Ecological Act: A Backgrounder to the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)
Videos on the Seminar "What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?"
Territories: Paradigm Shifts That Need to Be Made for the Transition
Cities for All
Take Back the Land!
The Post-modern State
Bank of the South, International Context, and Alternatives
Seven Complex Lessons in Education for the Future
What Europe does the world need?
Global Governance and the Achievement of a Universal Civil Society
On the Road to a Citizens Assembly
The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn from the World Comission of Dams?
Imagine All the People: Advancing a Global Citizens Movement
Inventing a New World Governance Now
China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2011. Greening the Economic Transformation
First Proposals for Building a New World-governance Architecture
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
For a World Citizen Movement
Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
Small-scale Sustainable Farmers Are Cooling Down the Earth
Rethinking Global Governance
From Westernization to Globalization. A Brief History of Chinese Modernity
Net Neutrality as Global Principle for Internet Governance
This text systematizes the FASE experience while operating in Amazonia and aims to contribute to the debate and to the diagnosis, views, and collective proposals of sustainable and democratic alternatives for the region, together with FASE’s partners.
The purpose of this document is to analyze the future of Amazonia as a national and international challenge, the political debate over the destiny of this Region and the big issues and arguments facing its development. It introduces also the contribution and the proposals of FASE (Federação de Órgãos para Assistência Social e Educacional – Federation of Organizations for Social and Educational Assistance) a NGO founded in 1961 working in all Brazil for Local, Communitarian and Associative Development.
Around Amazonia’s destiny one of the most important battles among the rich countries and the countries of the south is being waged, in a war that will decide where the burden will fall for each country, in the inevitable allocation of the costs of the environmental crisis and the catastrophic changes in the world’s climate. Brazil, considered to be the fifth largest global emitter of carbon dioxide due to deforestation, went back to being the target of international criticism coming from those who think that the country is not putting forth enough effort to guarantee the preservation of Amazonia. Meanwhile, here in Brazil, those defending Amazonia’s development at any price are not ashamed to use arguments such as to say that the rich countries have already destroyed their forests and now want to stop Brazil from doing the same in order to become a developed country.
The recently launched Accelerated Growth Plan (PAC) represents a move away from the neoliberal position of denying the role of the Government in the economy. With the PAC, the "invisible hand of the market" will be substituted for the "visible hand of the Government," which will once again have a decisive role "in planning, in defining priorities, and in articulating private and public sectors." Altogether, with the other large investments in Amazonian infrastructure on the horizon, it is clear that, in the PAC, some of the main issues regarding the development model for the region are condensed. Among these is the creation of three projects of high socio-environmental impact like hydroelectric plants, and paving of highways in order to satisfy the big producers’ needs.
In face of the multinationals interests, the supposed national-developmentalists continue to defend energy intensive projects of commodities production which neither protect the environment nor the most vulnerable segments of the population like the indigenous, farmers and peasant populations.
Several decades of background work on Amazonia gives FASE the responsibility of offering its experience to a greater project, in the framework of an organized network of Amazonian civil society. The fight for a sustainable and democratic Amazonia that shows solidarity, already counts among its forces a wide variety of social movements, associations, cooperatives, and civil society organizations. FASE’s commitments concerns the struggle for Agrarian Reform and land regularization, the struggle for Urban Reform, the guarantee of Food Security, the extension of Fair Trade and Solidarity activities, sustainable Consumption and consolidation of agro-ecology.