Economic Governance and Globalization
Final Declaration "Linking Alternatives 2"
A World Alliance against Social Apartheid
Moving Closer toward an International Standard on Corporate Social Responsibility
Seven Leverage Points for the Passage from Economy to Œconomy
Proposals for a Fair and Sustainable Economy
The One Party Planet
Letter to our readers and to the Mandela World Liberation Front
A Proposal for Governance in the Post 2011 World
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
Global Governance and the Achievement of a Universal Civil Society
3rd Dialogue Meeting between civil societies from China, Europe and South America
The State’s Legitimacy in Fragile Situations
Decent Work as a Goal for the Global Economy
The World March of Women Third International Action
Reclaiming the ASEAN Community for the People
Capitalism Has Failed: 5 Bold Ways to Build a New World
Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
For a Democratic Cosmopolitarian Movement
Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead
The Post-modern State
The Future of the Commons
Oil slicks: An Ocean of Profits
Alterglobalization, a Long-term Process Leading to Alternatives
Atlanta Declaration and Plan of Action For The Advancement Of The Right Of Access To Information
Rethinking Global Governance
Inventing a New World Governance Now
Alternative World Water Forum
Political Oversight of the ICANN: A Briefing for the WSIS Summit
In this article, Hahnel analyzes the historical reasons of the successes and fails of both democratic and libertarian Socialisms along the XX century, as well as the role played of the new social movement activism, as a current successor of the later one. Then, the author establishes some clues or advices related to several current progressive actors like the different economic, social, community and human rights issues, proposals, related movements, unions, and others.
Hahnel maintains a consensual perspective by deploying several arguments concerning a mutual need between reformists and radicals. They should not isolate one from the other, if they really want to constitute a plural, strong and serious alternative to the current system.
The author states that it is more important to build what is popularly known as the anti-globalization movement correctly than to have the "correct" analysis or the "correct" set of demands. Organizing opposition to corporate sponsored globalization "from the bottom up" is the right approach. Organizing all constituencies negatively affected to fight for their own interests while they learn why their own success necessarily hinges on the successes of other constituencies against whom global corporations will constantly pit them is the right approach. Working closely with third world organizations in the campaign against the global "race to the bottom" is the right approach. Adopting the "Lilliput strategy," where each constituency struggles to tie its own string to contain the "Gulliver" of global capital knowing (correctly) how weak and vulnerable its own string is without the added strength of tens of thousands of other strings, is the right approach.