Citizens’ Reappropriation of Politics
Do Space and Action Have to Be Contradictory? Toward an Inclusive WSF Strategy
On the Road to a Citizens Assembly
Final Declaration of the Sixth World Parliamentary Forum - Caracas 2006
People-centered Global Governance: Making It Happen!
Alterglobalization, a Long-term Process Leading to Alternatives
Global Democracy: Civil Society Visions and Strategies (G05) Conference Report
Civil Society’s Impact on the Multilateral Sphere: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
Can Civil Society Influence G8 Accountability?
Civil Society and the Legitimation of Global Governance
Non-state Actors and World Governance
Allende Hoy (English version)
When Dreams Come True
Imagine All the People: Advancing a Global Citizens Movement
Global Civil Society: Shifting Powers in a Shifting World
Capitalism Has Failed: 5 Bold Ways to Build a New World
Can Democracy Survive Interdependence?
For a Democratic Cosmopolitarian Movement
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
Rediscovering Nelson Mandela for the Twenty-first Century
Statement No. 1
Letter to our readers and to the Mandela World Liberation Front
How to break out the system trap. A model to support conversations for a more strategic activism.
New Rules for New Radicals ? *
Reclaiming the ASEAN Community for the People
The Future of Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Law
Forging a World of Liberty under Law: US National Security in the Twenty-first Century
The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn from the World Comission of Dams?
Conceptualising Global Democracy
The UN Reform and the Alterglobalization Movement
Does Global Governance Ensure That the Global Public Interest Is Served?
Setting up an Arbitration Tribunal on Debt: An Alternative Solution?
Persistent corruption in low-income countries requires global action
Global Governance and the Achievement of a Universal Civil Society
Retrieving and Valuing Other Ethical Pillars: The Concept of Buen Vivir*
Hearing on Neo-liberal Politics and European Transnational Corporations in Latin America and the Caribbean
This study focuses on the relationship between multi-lateral economic institutions (MEIs) and global social movements (GSMs) as one aspect of a much wider global politics and governance structure. Where possible, other actors and their relationship to the objects of this study, has been also considered.
Since the early 1980s there has been a gradual change in the functioning of key MEIs. Although the extent of this change has varied across institutions, the pattern of increasing engagement with social groups is noticeable. MEIs are moving beyond their interstate mandates to actively engage civil society actors in numerous countries. In order to gauge the significance of such developments this book investigates the interaction between three MEIs and three GSMs.1 The MEIs are the IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO while the GSMs are the environmental, labour and women’s movements.
The author argues that there is a transformation in the nature of global economic governance as a result of the MEI±GSM encounter. This transformation is labelled `complex multilateralism’ in recognition of its movement away from an exclusively state based structure. To date the transformation has largely taken the form of institutional modification rather than substantive policy innovation. Such changes expli-
citly acknowledge that actors other than states express the public interest. While signalling a clear alteration to the method of governance, the change in the content of governing policies and the broad interests they represent is less striking. In the short run the MEI±GSM nexus is unlikely to transform either institutional functions or their inherent nature to any significant degree. In the longer run, there is the possibility of incremental change in the functioning and ambit of these key institutions. Complex multilateralism has not challenged the fundamentals of existing world order, but it has incrementally pluralised governing structures.
(c) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000