Conflict Resolution and Sustainable Peace Building
Forging a World of Liberty under Law: US National Security in the Twenty-first Century
The Post-modern State
Israel / Palestine: The New Peace Movement
Persistent corruption in low-income countries requires global action
World Governance of Ressentiment*
Videos of the Governance and Ressentiment Seminar
Ressentiment* and World Governance
Like a Rainbow Nation
The World March of Women Third International Action
2015 : A turning point to face the climate challenge, exorcise fear and counter the logic of war.
A War Hiding Another War
Governance for Sustainability
The Future of Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Law
The One Party Planet
What South Africa Does the World Need?
Global Governance and the Achievement of a Universal Civil Society
Map of the WGI
On the Road to a Citizens Assembly
What Europe does the world need?
Conceptualising Global Democracy
Choosing between Two Evils or Rethinking Armed Interventionism
Beyond the Numbers
First Proposals for Building a New World-governance Architecture
Imagine All the People: Advancing a Global Citizens Movement
Another Future Is Possible
From Westernization to Globalization. A Brief History of Chinese Modernity
Dictionary of World Power
Participate in the Drafting and Circulation of the Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Universal Declaration of Emerging Human Rights
Political and Institutional Governance
The UN: Which Reforms for What Future?
Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
Ressentiment can be traced back through history, metamorphosing to reflect changes in the way humans organize society and affecting everything from conflicts to power structures. A phenomenon that is both individual and collective, ressentiment can oppose people and civilisations. We will therefore use the light shed by history to examine contexts favourable to the development of ressentiment and the notion of subjectivity that characterizes human interpretations. Historical facts lose all objective value when humans interpret them according to an established value system, a system that produces emotions and affects, including ressentiment. We will then attempt to show that the existence of ressentiment depends solely on human subjectivity and its imaginative universe.
Ressentiment has no homeland, since it is part and parcel of the passions inherent to human life, and as such is unbounded by time and space. The return of Islam and revival of jihad, the trouble brewing in Indian America and the harmful effects of the failure of Soviet communism are all phenomena that illustrate the major upsurge in ressentiment since the turn of the century and its strong global presence. It is therefore vital that international relations take the phenomenon into account, in order to identify the underlying determining factors and deep-seated issues that affect and drive peoples, ethnic groups and societies.
It is time to take a long hard look at ressentiment and use analysis of practical cases to try and define the concrete effects of ressentiment’s potential for stirring people to action and giving them a sense of identity, whether or not it has an ideological framework. We will examine this emotional force that gives humans the power to stand fast and, at times, to take action.
The concept of ressentiment has been the subject of very little study. We will therefore delve into the social sciences to trace the path taken by ressentiment, as it has followed changes in human thought, as well as by related concepts. Starting with Nietzsche, the first to give it a scientific value, we will provide an overview of the various authors who have tackled the subject, using different analytical approaches, from morals to values.
This “map” of ressentiment will conclude with ideas on possible methods for disarming ressentiment.
* Translator’s note:
"I have decided to use the term "ressentiment" throughout the article rather than the more usual “resentment” in line with the author’s intentions, and based on the following references:
A term imported by many languages for its philosophical and psychological connotations, "ressentiment" is not to be considered interchangeable with the normal English word "resentment", or even the French "ressentiment". While the normal words both speak to a feeling of frustration directed at a perceived source, neither speaks to the special relationship between a sense of inferiority and the creation of morality. Thus, the term ’Ressentiment’ as used here always maintains a distinction. (Wikipedia: Ressentiment)
As a widely recognized convention, the French spelling of this term has been retained in philosophical circles so as to preserve a broad sense of discursive meaning and application. (Wikipedia: Max Scheler’s Concept of Ressentiment)"
Philippa Bowe Smith