Conflict Resolution and Sustainable Peace Building
Forging a World of Liberty under Law: US National Security in the Twenty-first Century
Israel / Palestine: The New Peace Movement
Persistent corruption in low-income countries requires global action
World Governance of Ressentiment*
Videos of the Governance and Ressentiment Seminar
Ressentiment* and World Governance
Like a Rainbow Nation
Ressentiment* and the new world governance: a general analysis
The World March of Women Third International Action
2015 : A turning point to face the climate challenge, exorcise fear and counter the logic of war.
A War Hiding Another War
Expanding and Reinforcing the Objectives of the Kyoto Protocol: Inciting International Stakeholders to Engage in Greenhouse-gas Transparency
WGI: World Governance Index (2009 Report)
Global Environmental Governance: Elements of a Reform Agenda
Negative Growth or Sustainable Development?
Decent Work as a Goal for the Global Economy
Dictionary of World Power
For a World Citizen Movement
FASE’s Commitment to a Sustainable and Democratic Amazonia
The Extraterritorial Scope of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
Beyond the Growth Paradigm: Creating a Unified Progressive Politics
A World Alliance against Social Apartheid
Towards a World Citizens Movement
Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead
Alterglobalization, a Long-term Process Leading to Alternatives
Civil Society and the Legitimation of Global Governance
Does Global Governance Ensure That the Global Public Interest Is Served?
Structure of Global Governance: Explaining the Organizational Design of Global Rulemaking Institutions
The post-modern-state system has broken down national borders and rejected force for resolving disputes. The EU is the most developed example of this, but not the only one. On the other hand, the pre-modern state may be too weak even to secure its home territory, let alone pose a threat internationally, but can provide a base for non-state actors who are potentially dangerous to the post-modern world. Consequently, a new form of voluntary imperialism is needed for the world. The author illustrates this thesis with the example of the European intervention in the Balkans.
The main characteristics of the post-modern world are as follows:
breakdown of the distinction between domestic and foreign affairs;
mutual interference in (traditional) domestic affairs and mutual surveillance;
rejection of force for resolving disputes and consequent codification of self-enforced rules of behavior;
growing irrelevance of borders, come about both through the changing role of the state, but also through missiles, motor cars and satellites;
security based on transparency, mutual openness, interdependence and mutual vulnerability.
The fundamental point is that a large number of the most powerful states no longer want to fight or conquer. Imperialism in the traditional sense is dead, at least among the Western powers. The EU is the most developed example of a post-modern system. It represents security through transparency, and transparency through interdependence. While the members of the post-modern world may not represent a danger to one another, both the modern and pre-modern zones pose threats.
The pre-modern state may be too weak even to secure its home territory, let alone pose a threat internationally, but it can provide a base for non-state actors who may represent a danger to the post-modern world. If non-state actors, notably drug, crime, or terrorist syndicates, take to using pre-modern states as bases for attacks on the more orderly parts of the world, then the organized states may eventually have to respond.
All the conditions for imperialism are there, but both the supply and demand for imperialism have dried up. Yet the weak still need the strong, and the strong still need an orderly world, in which an efficient and well-governed export stability and liberty, and openness for investment and growth seem eminently desirable.
What is needed then is a new kind of imperialism, one acceptable to a world of human rights and cosmopolitan values. We can already discern its outline: an imperialism which, like all imperialism, aims to bring order and organization but which rests today on the voluntary principle.
Post-modern imperialism takes two forms. First there is the voluntary imperialism of the global economy. The second form of post-modern imperialism might be called the imperialism of neighbors. Instability in your neighborhood poses threats that no state can ignore. For example, misgovernment, ethnic violence, and crime in the Balkans poses a threat to Europe.
This article is published in the collection "Reordering the World: The Long Term Implications of September 11" published by The Foreign Policy Center.