Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
Global Environmental Governance: Elements of a Reform Agenda
Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
What Amazonia Does the World Need?
The Challenge of Environmental Governance
On the Road to Rio+20 - Proposals for a Citizen Project
"Biocivilization" for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet. Video on the Workshop
Biocivilization for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet - Workshop
Proposals for a New World Governance
Rethinking and Changing World Governance
Proposals for a Fair and Democratic Architecture of Power
Rio+20 and Beyond. No Future without Justice
A new historical moment?
Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development
Rio+20: Failed Diplomacy, Feeble Democracy
The Commons and World Governance
Dialog of Chinese, European, and South American Civil Societies at Rio+20
Call to Multiply the Village of Alternatives
3rd Dialogue Meeting between civil societies from China, Europe and South America
Could the COP 21 be our next Westphalian Moment?
Proposal Papers for the Rio+20 Peoples Summit
Seven Leverage Points for the Passage from Economy to Œconomy
The Post-modern State
Rethinking Global Governance
Redefining Global Governance to Meet the Challenges of the Twenty-first Century
Greenhouse-gas Emissions and Global Mitigation Efforts
The State’s Legitimacy in Fragile Situations
An Open Letter to the Commoners and Co-operators of the World
The Cosmopolitan State
Governance for Sustainability
The Global Marshall Plan
Hearing on Neo-liberal Politics and European Transnational Corporations in Latin America and the Caribbean
The Future of the Commons
Videos on the Seminar "What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?"
Global Governance and the Achievement of a Universal Civil Society
Universal Declaration of Emerging Human Rights
Extreme Poverty and World Governance
Proposal for a Charter of Universal Responsibilities
Map of the WGI
WGI: World Governance Index (2009 Report)
A Proposal for Governance in the Post 2011 World
A Global Pension Plan
Political Parties and Global Democracy
The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn from the World Comission of Dams?
This paper introduces the concept of earth system governance as a new social phenomenon, as a political program, and as a subject of research. It then sketches the key problem structures that complicate earth system governance and derives principles for earth system governance both as a political project and as research practice, namely credibility, stability, adaptiveness, and inclusiveness. The main part of the paper introduces five challenges that lie at the core of earth system governance: architecture, agency beyond the state, the adaptive state, accountability, and allocation.
In this paper, the concept of earth system governance is introduced as a new social phenomenon, as a political program, and as a subject of research. The author sketches then the key problem structures that complicate earth system governance and derives principles for earth system governance both as a political project and as research practice. In the main part of the paper the author introduces five research and governance challenges that lie at the core of earth system governance
The anthropogenic transformation of the earth system is diverse in its causes, consequences and possible responses, which makes it impossible to design one solution that fits all. Earth system governance must cope with at least five problem characteristics: high analytic and normative uncertainty; high temporal, functional and spatial interdependence; and potentially extreme impacts.
These problem characteristics of the global transformation of earth system parameters through human action are unprecedented in the governance of human affairs. From these characteristics of earth system transformation, the author derives four core principles of earth system governance: credibility, stability, adaptiveness, and inclusiveness.
Earth system governance is an emerging empirical phenomenon as well as a political project of the 21st century. In both dimensions, it is also a demanding challenge for social science, which must generate theoretical insights and practical tools to develop effective means of earth system governance. According to it, Biermann introduces five key clusters of questions that could guide a renewed research effort in earth system governance theory. It is the problem of different overall architectures of earth system governance, of agency beyond the state, of the adaptiveness of governance mechanisms and of their accountability and legitimacy, and of the mode of allocation in earth system governance.
Source: Frank Biermann, 2006, "Earth System Governance - The Challenge for Social Science", Global Governance Working Paper No. 19, Amsterdam et al.: The Global Governance Project, www.glogov.org, all rights remain with the author.