Conflict Resolution and Sustainable Peace Building
Forging a World of Liberty under Law: US National Security in the Twenty-first Century
The Post-modern State
Persistent corruption in low-income countries requires global action
World Governance of Ressentiment*
Videos of the Governance and Ressentiment Seminar
Ressentiment* and World Governance
Like a Rainbow Nation
Ressentiment* and the new world governance: a general analysis
The World March of Women Third International Action
2015 : A turning point to face the climate challenge, exorcise fear and counter the logic of war.
A War Hiding Another War
The IMF, the World Bank, and Respect of Human Rights
Rio+20: Failed Diplomacy, Feeble Democracy
A World Alliance against Social Apartheid
A Global Pension Plan
Proposal for a Charter of Universal Responsibilities
The Right to Water as a Human Right
Thirty years of Habitat I: no more neoliberal model of cities!
A European Way of Security. The Madrid Report on the Human Security Study Group
Bringing the Violence of War under Control in a Globalized World
What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?
Dialog of Chinese, European, and South American Civil Societies at Rio+20
Youth and World Governance
Earth System Governance - The Challenge for Social Science
PMCs, Human Security and Global Governance in Global Public Sphere
The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn from the World Comission of Dams?
An Israeli-Palestinian peace movement, new in kind, is emerging around the platform of two states and the rights of Israelis and Palestinians to live in dignity and security. Courageous individuals are trying to break the cycle of fear, humiliation, and incitement and are reaching out to partners on the other side. They are intent on filling the leadership vacuum left by the politicians. Their aim is to wrest the political agenda from the extremists and empower the majorities in both societies who want peace. Unlike earlier peace movements in the region, both sides are aware that they need each other to create political space; they both need to be able to show that it is possible to construct a civil-society partnership and that there are alternatives to extremism.
An analysis of domestic politics on both sides is critical for understanding the escalation of the conflict in the course of the past two years. The violence obscures the reality that as many Palestinians and Israelis support peace on the basis of mutual compromise as those who condone violence. The problem is that the politicians on both sides have failed to provide the leadership necessary to transform the yearning for peace into a political program. Instead, they have allowed messianic extremists to hijack the political agenda and drag both societies into war.
The international community, including outside governments and international institutions as well as civil society, carries its share of responsibility for the current state of affairs. The central contention of this paper is that any international strategy for finding a just and sustainable settlement to this conflict has to take as its starting point efforts to support, legitimize, and take advice from the emerging Israeli-Palestinian peace movement.
Source: Centre for the Study of Global Governance