World Governance. A Personal European View
Inventing a New World Governance Now
WGI: World Governance Index (2009 Report)
First Proposals for Building a New World-governance Architecture
What South Africa Does the World Need?
Youth and World Governance
Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Retrieving and Valuing Other Ethical Pillars: The Concept of Buen Vivir*
World Governance Index (WGI)
Theories of Global Governance
Participate in the Drafting and Circulation of the Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Preparing Rio+20 at the Thematic Social Forum: A Historical Opportunity
Foundations for Biocivilization
Proposal for a Charter of Universal Responsibilities
Another Future Is Possible
Proposal Papers for the Rio+20 Peoples Summit
Rio + ???
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
A Proposal for Governance in the Post 2011 World
Swords into Plowshares
Post-2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Dictionary of World Power
Towards a World Citizens Movement
For a World Citizen Movement
International Civil Society Week, Bogota 2016
The Commons, the State and Transformative Politics
Political and Institutional Governance
PMCs, Human Security and Global Governance in Global Public Sphere
The World March of Women Third International Action
Governance of the World Banana Trade
Migrants spearhead an unprecedented political-cultural battle: to open new routes to the world
For Climate Justice and a World Fit to Be Lived in
Kicking the Habit: The World Bank and the IMF Are Still Addicted to Attaching Economic-policy Conditions to Aid
For Global Reform, a Social Democratic Approach to Globalization
Beyond the Numbers
Decent Work as a Goal for the Global Economy
3rd Dialogue Meeting between civil societies from China, Europe and South America
The Five WGI Indicators
What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?
Territories and Globalization: The Stakes of Development
Building Consensus on Food Safety Programs among Consumer and Public Health Organizations
Proposals for a New World Governance
New York summit is last chance to get consensus on climate before 2015 talks
Soldiers and the Latest Trends: Lessons from Yugoslavia?
Ressentiment* and the new world governance: a general analysis
A Primer on Global Economic Sharing
Letter to our readers and to the Mandela World Liberation Front
Rethinking and Changing World Governance
Choosing between Two Evils or Rethinking Armed Interventionism
Raising International Climate Finance
Biocivilization for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet - Workshop
Rediscovering Nelson Mandela for the Twenty-first Century
Fair Coop, the Earth cooperative for a fair economy
The Commons and World Governance
The Global Marshall Plan is a plan
for all the world’s people to work in
solidarity to eliminate poverty once
and for all and to heal the environmental
The Global Marshall Plan takes its
name from the post-World War II
Marshall Plan, a massive and successful
project to provide aid to Western
European countries—including Germany,
which had been our antagonist
in the war. Historians have debated
how altruistic the plan was. Some
argue that a large part of the motivation
for the original Marshall Plan was
to strengthen capitalist economies in
Europe to prevent them from becoming Communist.
A similar motive to prevent the world from devolving into
terrorist-generated chaos might inspire some who will join our efforts for
a Global Marshall Plan. But other historians point to the strong strands of
generosity that were tapped when Americans embraced rebuilding the devastated
lives of the defeated nations against which they had just waged war.
This was enlightened self-interest, and it can ally with strong altruistic tendencies
that persist in Americans and many others around the world, this
time mobilized to combat the suffering of humanity that leads to destructive
wars, violence and ecological irresponsibility.
The spirit of generosity that is needed for a Global Marshall Plan has fallen
victim to the rise of fear and looking out for number one that has dominated
American politics in the last thirty years. Today, while other wealthy
countries do poorly enough by giving only 30 cents in aid per $100 of income
in their countries, the U.S. does even worse: it gives only 17 cents per
$100 of income. The Right has successfully convinced many Americans
that we are giving a huge part of our budget to aid—but the facts are quite
The Global Marshal Plan should, among others:
- Provide enough funding to eliminate
domestic and global poverty,
homelessness, hunger, inadequate
education and inadequate
health care, plus repair the global
- Create an international, unbiased, nongovernmental agency for receiving
the funds (from both foreign aid and alternative sources of
financing) and distributing them in a way that is environmentally
sensitive, respectful of native cultures, safeguarded against corruption,
protected from manipulation to serve elite interests, and
empowering of the people in each region.
- Revise trade agreements in which the U.S. is currently involved so
that they no longer privilege the most powerful and economically
successful Western countries and the elites of other countries at the
expense of the poor of the world.
- Ensure hands-on involvement
from peoples of the world
through an International Peace
and Generosity Corps.
- Fund trained, unarmed, civilian peace teams such as the Nonviolent
Peaceforce to intervene in areas of conflict.
- Train everyone on the planet in
techniques of nonviolent communication,
sustainability, family and parental
support, stress reduction, emergency
health techniques, diet and
exercise, and caring for others who
are in need of help.
- Empower girls.
- Ensure that the local village communities
feel empowered by the
programs being introduced.