World Governance. A Personal European View
Inventing a New World Governance Now
WGI: World Governance Index (2009 Report)
First Proposals for Building a New World-governance Architecture
What South Africa Does the World Need?
Youth and World Governance
Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Retrieving and Valuing Other Ethical Pillars: The Concept of Buen Vivir*
World Governance Index (WGI)
Theories of Global Governance
Participate in the Drafting and Circulation of the Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Preparing Rio+20 at the Thematic Social Forum: A Historical Opportunity
Foundations for Biocivilization
Proposal for a Charter of Universal Responsibilities
Another Future Is Possible
Proposal Papers for the Rio+20 Peoples Summit
Rio + ???
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
The Global Marshall Plan
Swords into Plowshares
Post-2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Dictionary of World Power
Towards a World Citizens Movement
For a World Citizen Movement
International Civil Society Week, Bogota 2016
From the Forum for a new World Governance (FnWG) to the World Democratic Forum (WDF)
The New Republic Will be Democratic and Socially Oriented
Winnowing Wheat from Chaff
After Copenhagen, Some Light on the Horizon
Henceforth, the Keys to the Future are Responsibility, Solidarity, and Courage
Israel / Palestine: The New Peace Movement
Rio+20: Failed Diplomacy, Feeble Democracy
Setting up an Arbitration Tribunal on Debt: An Alternative Solution?
Bank of the South, International Context, and Alternatives
What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?
Atlanta Declaration and Plan of Action For The Advancement Of The Right Of Access To Information
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
Videos of the Governance and Ressentiment Seminar
How to break out the system trap. A model to support conversations for a more strategic activism.
Biocivilization for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet - Workshop
The Future of the Commons
Political Oversight of the ICANN: A Briefing for the WSIS Summit
Capitalism Has Failed: 5 Bold Ways to Build a New World
Proposals for a Fair and Democratic Architecture of Power
World Charter of Free Media
Rethinking and Changing World Governance
2015 : A turning point to face the climate challenge, exorcise fear and counter the logic of war.
Imagine All the People: Advancing a Global Citizens Movement
New York summit is last chance to get consensus on climate before 2015 talks
The Emergence of Global Administrative Law
An Open Letter to the Commoners and Co-operators of the World
Take Back the Land!
The World March of Women Third International Action
Seven Leverage Points for the Passage from Economy to Œconomy
Territories: Paradigm Shifts That Need to Be Made for the Transition
Conceptualising Global Democracy
For Climate Justice and a World Fit to Be Lived in
"Biocivilization" for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet. Video on the Workshop
Global Civil Society: Shifting Powers in a Shifting World
Rediscovering Nelson Mandela for the Twenty-first Century
Fair Coop, the Earth cooperative for a fair economy
Optimism is a political act. In fact, these days, cynicism is obedience. - Alex Steffen
The world is long overdue for a completely new system of governance. The need for political representation or a paternalistic and opaque authority has been removed by technology. Governance by nation states is now as arbitrary and illogical as city states were earlier found to be. Corporations have the freedom to live in a world without borders or social responsibility, to own property no individual can claim and to control a one world government and legal system, with insupportable consequences for the world’s resources and individual rights. To effect the change we require in 2012, to give individuals control and responsibility, to bring regional systems under regional governance and protect the heritage of future generations, we need a new political model.
In any system where groups have power, individual rights are always at risk. Both pure democracy and communism have brought human rights horrors every bit as reprehensible as fascist states; in order to guard against genocide, torture, and other persecution of individuals in the name of the greater good, a system must safeguard individual rights above all other authority.
Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights specifies that individual rights are to be applied equally without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. With the addition of age, this would prevent discrimination against any group. Groups are not individuals and no group is entitled to special and further rights or protections under individual rights.
A recognition of individual rights will include life, liberty, security of person, access to the basic essentials of life including knowledge, privacy and personal autonomy in matters not affecting the rest of society, free development of personality and potential, and a fair legal system which does not promote wishes of the group over rights of the individual.
Autonomous peer to peer user groups for systems
Governments up till now have been run by hierarchical groups, which act as the final authority on all topics for an entire region for an arbitrarily specified length of time or until they are overthrown by another group. What these authorities govern is a series of systems, controlled by the state or corporations, and run as dictatorships where workers’ individual rights are exchanged for the basic necessities of life. These systems have profit for the top of the hierarchy as their objective; they are not set up to provide an efficient or superior service or product to the users.
If these systems were organized as autonomous, transparent, porous, peer to peer user groups, they would be far better governed by themselves. The current political structure does not recognize that every system is not of concern or interest to everyone in the region, or that some users have far greater knowledge and expertise in specific areas than others. We need a system where responsibility and control rests with the entire user group and expertise is acknowledged and put to best use.
Autonomous: each user group should consist of all people affected by the system and no people not affected by the system.
Transparent: all information related to the system must be fully transparent in order for users to participate in tasks or auditing.
Porous: contribution at all levels of each user group must be open to all users with acceptance by peer review.
Peer to peer: each user group should consist of users: audit and provide feedback, contributors: interested users who periodically present work for acceptance by the members, members: have acquired expertise and been accepted as full contributing members by the user group, and a core group: recognized by the group as having the necessary level of expertise to provide direction for the system.
Meritocracy: A side effect of these user groups is that they provide workers with the three motivators which provide the greatest job satisfaction, autonomy, mastery and purpose. People can work on anything they like, they are not required to submit resumes, acquire accreditation, seniority, or approval from an individual authority. If their work is good enough it will be accepted by the user group. Everyone can work on the system that interests them, doing the jobs at the level they are capable of, with as much or as little involvement as they choose.
Systems should be organized by user groups, not by nations or treaties. International systems would include things such as the internet, telecommunications and knowledge, local systems would include things such as transit, food production and social services, and in any situation where only one family or an individual is affected, the responsibility would lie with only them. Each local user group or individual would have access to outside user groups for trade, shared knowledge, disaster relief, etc., autonomous but networked.
Anything which is not only of global interest but also does not belong to any one generation cannot be destroyed and cannot be claimed as the property of any individual, group, corporation or government. Global commons would include space, the atmosphere and electromagnetic field, deep sea ocean, land and water masses of sufficient size to have global impact, areas of the biosphere which are rare or important enough to be of global concern, and knowledge. Knowledge includes discoveries, history, creative works, and the information people require in order to govern themselves and excludes personal information regarding individuals. There should be no restriction on the use of ideas, although creativity needs to be compensated and credited.
Anything belonging to the global commons must be held under stewardship of a porous and transparent peer to peer organization set up for the purpose, and the mandate for all global commons must include the protection and preservation of the commons. All systems which affect the commons must work with the commons in their design and implementation.
2010 we woke up. 2011 we stood up. 2012 we take over.
The following articles have been included in the pdf document:
- The Financial System
- Needed now: A News Commons
- Privacy and Transparency
- Groups and Individuals
- Concentric User Groups and Epistemic Communities
Source: WL Central (Wikileaks)