World Governance. A Personal European View
Inventing a New World Governance Now
WGI: World Governance Index (2009 Report)
First Proposals for Building a New World-governance Architecture
What South Africa Does the World Need?
Youth and World Governance
Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Retrieving and Valuing Other Ethical Pillars: The Concept of Buen Vivir*
World Governance Index (WGI)
Theories of Global Governance
Participate in the Drafting and Circulation of the Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Preparing Rio+20 at the Thematic Social Forum: A Historical Opportunity
Foundations for Biocivilization
Proposal for a Charter of Universal Responsibilities
Another Future Is Possible
Proposal Papers for the Rio+20 Peoples Summit
Rio + ???
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
The Global Marshall Plan
A Proposal for Governance in the Post 2011 World
Post-2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Dictionary of World Power
Towards a World Citizens Movement
For a World Citizen Movement
International Civil Society Week, Bogota 2016
Territories: Paradigm Shifts That Need to Be Made for the Transition
The UN Reform and the Alterglobalization Movement
Capitalism Has Failed: 5 Bold Ways to Build a New World
Marrakech Process for the Protection and Promotion of All Human Rights of Migrants and Persons in Transnational Mobility
The World March of Women Third International Action
For Climate Justice and a World Fit to Be Lived in
For Global Reform, a Social Democratic Approach to Globalization
Negative Growth or Sustainable Development?
The UN: Which Reforms for What Future?
Rediscovering Nelson Mandela for the Twenty-first Century
Mobilize and organize to Stop and Prevent Planet Fever!
Thirty years of Habitat I: no more neoliberal model of cities!
Videos on the Seminar "What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?"
Take Back the Land!
Alternative World Water Forum
Map of the WGI
Global Civil Society: Shifting Powers in a Shifting World
Migrants spearhead an unprecedented political-cultural battle: to open new routes to the world
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2011. Greening the Economic Transformation
What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?
World Governance of Ressentiment*
World Governance of Civilian and Military Nuclear Energy
Universal Declaration of Emerging Human Rights
Fair Coop, the Earth cooperative for a fair economy
The Commons and World Governance
A Primer on Global Economic Sharing
Using a simulation model, this research examines the potential impact of a very large-scale
foreign development-assistance program (a “Global Marshall Plan”), financed largely from
reallocation of military expenditure, on the future development of the world economy. The
model’s key premise is that inequality among nations in per capita income is all or mostly due to
differentials in generalized capital stocks. Generalized capital encompasses all reproducible
primary factors of production other than raw labor power, and it includes, in addition to the value
of plant and machinery, the value of education and training inputs into the labor force, and the
value of social infrastructure capital such as roads and schools.
The program, dubbed the World
Economic Equalization Program (WEEP), would entail large-scale transfers of new generalized
capital investment from rich nations to poor nations. The benchmark simulation of the model
without such a program in operation indicates indefinite continuation of the recent trend toward
increasing world economic inequality. The benchmark simulation of the model with the program
in operation indicates a dramatic reduction in world economic inequality, at the cost of a very
minor retardation in the economic growth of the rich nations.
Sensitivity analysis demonstrates
that with certain key exceptions, the optimistic results are reasonably robust against parametric
variation. In cases of unfavorable parameter values, such that the equalizing effect of the program
is minor, the cost is mostly borne by the poor nations, in the sense that unfavorable parameter
values do not reduce the economic growth of the rich nations by a substantial amount. These
results might support the initiation of a real-world WEEP on a tentative and provisional basis,
with the intention of abandoning it if, after a fair trial period of perhaps 10-15 years, the achieved
results are disappointing.