Trade, Money, and Finances
On the Road to a Citizens Assembly
Dialog of Chinese, European, and South American Civil Societies at Rio+20
People-centered Global Governance: Making It Happen!
Political and Institutional Governance
A Bit Rich: Calculating the Real Value to Society of Different Professions
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
The Extraterritorial Scope of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
Thirty years of Habitat I: no more neoliberal model of cities!
What Europe does the world need?
Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development
The IMF, the World Bank, and Respect of Human Rights
Nairobi World Parliamentary Forum Resolution
"Negative Growth": Rebirth of a Revolutionary Concept
Building Consensus on Food Safety Programs among Consumer and Public Health Organizations
Proposals for a Fair and Sustainable Economy
Alterglobalization, a Long-term Process Leading to Alternatives
FASE’s Commitment to a Sustainable and Democratic Amazonia
Alternative World Water Forum
The Emergence of Global Administrative Law
For Climate Justice and a World Fit to Be Lived in
Rio+20 and Beyond. No Future without Justice
Now is the time to rediscover John Maynard Keynes’s revolutionary ideas for the organization of international trade and adapt them to re-balance finances in the world’s economies of the twenty-first century.
The economist John Maynard Keynes came to the postwar table with an innovative project for the future of world trade, which he called the International Trade Organization (ITO), supported by an international central bank, the International Clearing Union (ICU). The ICU was meant to issue a world currency for trade, the "bancor." Why the ITO and the ICU never materialized, and what would have changed if they had, is a sobering story from which we have a lot to learn.
It tells us that, in a rational world, it would be possible to build a trading system serving the needs of people in both the North and the South. With an ITO and an ICU, we could have had a world order in which no country could run a huge trade deficit (the US deficit stood at $716 billion in 2005) or the huge trade surplus of contemporary China.
Under such a system, crushing the third-world debt and the devastating structural-adjustment policies applied by the World Bank and the IMF would have been unthinkable, although the system would not have abolished capitalism. If we could resurrect Keynes’s concept, another world really might be possible: he figured out how to make it work more than 60 years ago. His plan would have to be dusted off and fine tuned, but its core remains relevant.