Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
Global Environmental Governance: Elements of a Reform Agenda
Earth System Governance - The Challenge for Social Science
Environmental Governance and Managing the Earth
The Challenge of Environmental Governance
On the Road to Rio+20 - Proposals for a Citizen Project
"Biocivilization" for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet. Video on the Workshop
Biocivilization for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet - Workshop
Proposals for a New World Governance
Rethinking and Changing World Governance
Proposals for a Fair and Democratic Architecture of Power
Rio+20 and Beyond. No Future without Justice
A new historical moment?
Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development
Rio+20: Failed Diplomacy, Feeble Democracy
The Commons and World Governance
Dialog of Chinese, European, and South American Civil Societies at Rio+20
Call to Multiply the Village of Alternatives
3rd Dialogue Meeting between civil societies from China, Europe and South America
Non-state Actors and World Governance
Global Democracy: Civil Society Visions and Strategies (G05) Conference Report
Nairobi World Parliamentary Forum Resolution
Towards a Global Political-Economic Architecture of Environmental Space
Redefining Global Governance to Meet the Challenges of the Twenty-first Century
Political Parties and Global Democracy
After Copenhagen, Some Light on the Horizon
Henceforth, the Keys to the Future are Responsibility, Solidarity, and Courage
Proposals for a Fair and Sustainable Economy
Videos on the Seminar "What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?"
World Governance. A Personal European View
Giving Africa Voice within Global Governance: Oral History, Human Rights and the United Nations Human Rights Council
When World-regulation Experts "Play" the Regions ...
China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2011. Greening the Economic Transformation
Seven Leverage Points for the Passage from Economy to Œconomy
Beyond the Numbers
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
For a World Citizen Movement
Territories and Globalization: The Stakes of Development
The State’s Legitimacy in Fragile Situations
Education International’s Response to the Global Monitoring Report 2006 on "Literacy for Life"
Structure of Global Governance: Explaining the Organizational Design of Global Rulemaking Institutions
Regulating Transnational Companies: 46 Proposals
Sustainable Forest Management
Governance of the World Banana Trade
Bringing the Violence of War under Control in a Globalized World
WGI: World Governance Index (2009 Report)
What South Africa Does the World Need?
Amazonia concentrates the essential contradictions of our era: our planet’s lung is being devastated by rampant deforestation, predatory mining, and chaotic urbanization. Its peoples may have been able to preserve the potential of their surrounding biodiversity, but Amazonia suffers from “bad” governance: it is deprived of a collective and rational management of its resources. Worse, it is an arena of recurrent Human Rights violations, with as primary victims its poorest, most humble inhabitants.
This publication gathers documents resulting from the first seminar of the Forum for a new World Governance around the question: “What Amazonia Does the World Need?”
Gustavo Marin, Director, Forum for a new World Governance
History is marked with cities, regions, and territories that have played a particularly important symbolic role as places in which the destiny of a people, a society, or even of the whole world have found themselves at a crossroads. Amazonia is definitely one of these places. It is a concentrate of our essential contemporary contradictions: this ocean of vegetation, this gigantic territory through which flows the longest river in the world, this, our planet’s lung, is being devastated by rampant
deforestation, predatory mining, and chaotic urbanization. Carved apart by nationstates along lines that do not even follow natural river or forest boundaries and cut through human-community settlements, Amazonia is broken up by borders obstructing the new winds of a globalized world. Its peoples may have been able to preserve the potential of their surrounding biodiversity, but Amazonia suffers
from “bad” governance: it is deprived of a collective and rational management of its resources. Worse, it is an arena of recurrent Human Rights violations, with as primary victims its poorest, most humble inhabitants.
Yet although Amazonia concentrates all possible dangers, not only to its
inhabitants but also for the planet’s ecological balances, it also represents a territory for life and the future. The game is not over. In this dawning of the twenty-first century, it is poised to become one of those essential places where humankind will find the biological, political, and cultural resources of a new relationship—with the biosphere and among all peoples—founded on dignity and solidarity. Amazonia
can be the fertile field of a true school of “good” governance if it is looked after as a common and valuable good, first by Brazilians (65% of Amazonia is within Brazilian borders) and the people of the South American countries surrounding it, but also by all the Earth’s inhabitants. Despite the difficulties, Amazonia is in fact one of the areas where new mechanisms for a responsible, effective, and legitimate
governance are being invented.
This is why we took the initiative, together with Cândido Grzybowski,
Director of IBASE, to organize in Rio de Janeiro, in May 2008, the first seminar of the Forum for a new World governance around the question: “What Amazonia does the world need?” The seminar was backed by the Charles Léopold Mayer Foundation for the Progress of Humankind, an independent Swiss foundation devoted to mobilizing knowledge and experiences to face the major challenges of our times.
This publication comprises three documents: the discussion paper by
Cândido Grzybowski, the seminar report by Patrick Piro, journalist at Politis (France), and an Afterword written by Arnaud Blin, coordinator of the Forum for a new World Governance, in which the proposals drawn up during the seminar are correlated with world governance.