World Governance. A Personal European View
Inventing a New World Governance Now
First Proposals for Building a New World-governance Architecture
What South Africa Does the World Need?
Youth and World Governance
Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Retrieving and Valuing Other Ethical Pillars: The Concept of Buen Vivir*
World Governance Index (WGI)
Theories of Global Governance
Participate in the Drafting and Circulation of the Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Preparing Rio+20 at the Thematic Social Forum: A Historical Opportunity
Foundations for Biocivilization
Proposal for a Charter of Universal Responsibilities
Another Future Is Possible
Proposal Papers for the Rio+20 Peoples Summit
Rio + ???
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
The Global Marshall Plan
A Proposal for Governance in the Post 2011 World
Swords into Plowshares
Post-2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Dictionary of World Power
Towards a World Citizens Movement
For a World Citizen Movement
Biocivilization for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet - Workshop
FASE’s Commitment to a Sustainable and Democratic Amazonia
Seven Leverage Points for the Passage from Economy to Œconomy
Civil Society Politics Manifesto
Rediscovering Nelson Mandela for the Twenty-first Century
Letter to our readers and to the Mandela World Liberation Front
The Right to Water as a Human Right
Global Calling-for-help Center
Decent Work as a Goal for the Global Economy
Global Environmental Governance: Elements of a Reform Agenda
After Copenhagen, Some Light on the Horizon
Henceforth, the Keys to the Future are Responsibility, Solidarity, and Courage
Negative Growth or Sustainable Development?
The Five WGI Indicators
The Extraterritorial Scope of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
New York summit is last chance to get consensus on climate before 2015 talks
Videos of the Governance and Ressentiment Seminar
Ressentiment* and the new world governance: a general analysis
Political and Institutional Governance
The Cosmopolitan State
Do Space and Action Have to Be Contradictory? Toward an Inclusive WSF Strategy
Capitalism Has Failed: 5 Bold Ways to Build a New World
PMCs, Human Security and Global Governance in Global Public Sphere
Map of the WGI
The Future of Global Governance
Structure of Global Governance: Explaining the Organizational Design of Global Rulemaking Institutions
Building Consensus on Food Safety Programs among Consumer and Public Health Organizations
Cities for All
Can Civil Society Influence G8 Accountability?
Bringing the Violence of War under Control in a Globalized World
Rethinking and Changing World Governance
The UN: Which Reforms for What Future?
Beyond the Growth Paradigm: Creating a Unified Progressive Politics
Can Democracy Survive Interdependence?
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
Proposals for a Fair and Sustainable Economy
Extreme Poverty and World Governance
Territories: Paradigm Shifts That Need to Be Made for the Transition
Developing a new world governance constitutes one of the major challenges of our times, perhaps the most important of all. With this in view, the Forum for a new World Governance launched a number of research projects intended to draw up a roadmap and a set a framework for our work. World governance, though touching upon several domains, is an essentially political phenomenon—in the noble sense of the term—as it ultimately concerns the collective organization of the management of the planet. Politics being above all a practical art, not a science, it relies on mainly qualitative research work. Nevertheless, quantitative tools are indispensable and remain an important complement to this type of work.
World governance is a new field of study and requires the greatest possible amount of contributions. To make sure progress is made, to get the best odds for going in the right direction, it needs to be evaluated, especially over time. In other words, it is imperative to see how it evolves. This is why we felt it was necessary to study the possibility of developing a "World Governance Indicator" (WGI). Not to be in tune with the current indicator fashion, but to get a better grasp of the problems involved and follow their evolution with sharper tools.
The index developed here constitutes a first in World Governance. Like any other prototype or first model, this WGI is most certainly perfectible; it is a tool limited, like most indicators of this type, by a number of elements, starting with the availability of the data and, to varying degrees, by the inevitable subjectivity of its inventors. All the same, made up of a series of indicators and sub-indicators, it offers a relatively precise, overall view of world governance. Over time, it will make it possible to grasp the evolution of things. The WGI was designed with a strictly scientific goal in mind, with no ulterior political motives. Renaud François,  who designed it, built on his important experience on the field, as well as on the conceptual know-how he had already put to work for the peace indicators he developed a few years ago with the collaboration of Arnaud Blin.
The following domains, in the form of indicators and composite indexes, were selected to achieve the development of the WGI: Peace and Security, Rule of Law, Human Rights and Participation, Sustainable Development, and Human Development.
The document and any excerpt of it, and all the results are under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike license.
 Lieutenant Colonel (ret.) Renaud François held major posts in the General Staff or in high-level units (among others, at the African Unit of the Center for Planning and Command of the General Staff of the Armed Forces in Paris, at the Intelligence Office of the Inter-army Services General Staff for Operational Planning in Creil, and as Information Systems and Communications Officer of the General Staff of EUROFOR in Florence, Italy). He also held positions of responsibility for the United Nations (UNTSO mission in the Near East—Egypt, Israel, Jordan and Syria—and ONUVEH in Haiti), at the OSCE in Vienna (Conflict Prevention Centre, with special charge of the High Karabakh conflict), and for the European Union in Brussels (setting up military crisis-management centers within the framework of the European security and defense policy). Lieutenant Colonel François has a Humanities and Liberal Arts Masters in Humanitarian Aid and Solidarity from the University of Lyons 2. He is currently associate researcher for the European Strategic Intelligence & Security Center (ESISC) in Brussels.
EN Summarized version 14p.
EN full version 81 p.