World Governance. A Personal European View
Inventing a New World Governance Now
First Proposals for Building a New World-governance Architecture
What South Africa Does the World Need?
Youth and World Governance
Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Retrieving and Valuing Other Ethical Pillars: The Concept of Buen Vivir*
World Governance Index (WGI)
Theories of Global Governance
Participate in the Drafting and Circulation of the Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Preparing Rio+20 at the Thematic Social Forum: A Historical Opportunity
Foundations for Biocivilization
Proposal for a Charter of Universal Responsibilities
Another Future Is Possible
Proposal Papers for the Rio+20 Peoples Summit
Rio + ???
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
The Global Marshall Plan
A Proposal for Governance in the Post 2011 World
Swords into Plowshares
Post-2015: Global Action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future
Dictionary of World Power
Towards a World Citizens Movement
For a World Citizen Movement
Low-carbon Economy and Sustainable Development
Bank of the South, International Context, and Alternatives
Global Environmental Governance: Elements of a Reform Agenda
A Bit Rich: Calculating the Real Value to Society of Different Professions
For Climate Justice and a World Fit to Be Lived in
Bringing the Violence of War under Control in a Globalized World
"Biocivilization" for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet. Video on the Workshop
Videos on the Seminar "What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?"
Beyond the Growth Paradigm: Creating a Unified Progressive Politics
The Future of Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Law
Net Neutrality as Global Principle for Internet Governance
Can We Close the Education Gap?
The World March of Women Third International Action
PMCs, Human Security and Global Governance in Global Public Sphere
Ressentiment* and World Governance
Giving Africa Voice within Global Governance: Oral History, Human Rights and the United Nations Human Rights Council
Do Space and Action Have to Be Contradictory? Toward an Inclusive WSF Strategy
Political Parties and Global Democracy
Universal Declaration of Emerging Human Rights
The World Governance Index (WGI)
Global Calling-for-help Center
Dialog of Chinese, European, and South American Civil Societies at Rio+20
Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development
Capitalism Has Failed: 5 Bold Ways to Build a New World
Map of the WGI
What Europe does the world need?
The Future of Global Governance
Structure of Global Governance: Explaining the Organizational Design of Global Rulemaking Institutions
Regulating Transnational Companies: 46 Proposals
The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn from the World Comission of Dams?
Building Consensus on Food Safety Programs among Consumer and Public Health Organizations
The UN: Which Reforms for What Future?
Rural Areas and World Governance
Political and Institutional Governance
Moving Toward a New World Governance
Basic Food Income: Option or Obligation?
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
The Challenge of Environmental Governance
Rethinking and Changing World Governance
World Governance of Civilian and Military Nuclear Energy
Developing a new world governance constitutes one of the major challenges of our times, perhaps the most important of all. With this in view, the Forum for a new World Governance launched a number of research projects intended to draw up a roadmap and a set a framework for our work. World governance, though touching upon several domains, is an essentially political phenomenon—in the noble sense of the term—as it ultimately concerns the collective organization of the management of the planet. Politics being above all a practical art, not a science, it relies on mainly qualitative research work. Nevertheless, quantitative tools are indispensable and remain an important complement to this type of work.
World governance is a new field of study and requires the greatest possible amount of contributions. To make sure progress is made, to get the best odds for going in the right direction, it needs to be evaluated, especially over time. In other words, it is imperative to see how it evolves. This is why we felt it was necessary to study the possibility of developing a "World Governance Indicator" (WGI). Not to be in tune with the current indicator fashion, but to get a better grasp of the problems involved and follow their evolution with sharper tools.
The index developed here constitutes a first in World Governance. Like any other prototype or first model, this WGI is most certainly perfectible; it is a tool limited, like most indicators of this type, by a number of elements, starting with the availability of the data and, to varying degrees, by the inevitable subjectivity of its inventors. All the same, made up of a series of indicators and sub-indicators, it offers a relatively precise, overall view of world governance. Over time, it will make it possible to grasp the evolution of things. The WGI was designed with a strictly scientific goal in mind, with no ulterior political motives. Renaud François,  who designed it, built on his important experience on the field, as well as on the conceptual know-how he had already put to work for the peace indicators he developed a few years ago with the collaboration of Arnaud Blin.
The following domains, in the form of indicators and composite indexes, were selected to achieve the development of the WGI: Peace and Security, Rule of Law, Human Rights and Participation, Sustainable Development, and Human Development.
The document and any excerpt of it, and all the results are under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike license.
 Lieutenant Colonel (ret.) Renaud François held major posts in the General Staff or in high-level units (among others, at the African Unit of the Center for Planning and Command of the General Staff of the Armed Forces in Paris, at the Intelligence Office of the Inter-army Services General Staff for Operational Planning in Creil, and as Information Systems and Communications Officer of the General Staff of EUROFOR in Florence, Italy). He also held positions of responsibility for the United Nations (UNTSO mission in the Near East—Egypt, Israel, Jordan and Syria—and ONUVEH in Haiti), at the OSCE in Vienna (Conflict Prevention Centre, with special charge of the High Karabakh conflict), and for the European Union in Brussels (setting up military crisis-management centers within the framework of the European security and defense policy). Lieutenant Colonel François has a Humanities and Liberal Arts Masters in Humanitarian Aid and Solidarity from the University of Lyons 2. He is currently associate researcher for the European Strategic Intelligence & Security Center (ESISC) in Brussels.
EN Summarized version 14p.
EN full version 81 p.