Citizens’ Reappropriation of Politics
Do Space and Action Have to Be Contradictory? Toward an Inclusive WSF Strategy
On the Road to a Citizens Assembly
Final Declaration of the Sixth World Parliamentary Forum - Caracas 2006
People-centered Global Governance: Making It Happen!
Alterglobalization, a Long-term Process Leading to Alternatives
Global Democracy: Civil Society Visions and Strategies (G05) Conference Report
Civil Society’s Impact on the Multilateral Sphere: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
Can Civil Society Influence G8 Accountability?
Civil Society and the Legitimation of Global Governance
Non-state Actors and World Governance
Contesting Global Governance. Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements
Allende Hoy (English version)
When Dreams Come True
Imagine All the People: Advancing a Global Citizens Movement
Global Civil Society: Shifting Powers in a Shifting World
Capitalism Has Failed: 5 Bold Ways to Build a New World
Can Democracy Survive Interdependence?
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
Rediscovering Nelson Mandela for the Twenty-first Century
Statement No. 1
Letter to our readers and to the Mandela World Liberation Front
How to break out the system trap. A model to support conversations for a more strategic activism.
New Rules for New Radicals ? *
Reclaiming the ASEAN Community for the People
World Charter of Free Media
PMCs, Human Security and Global Governance in Global Public Sphere
Proposals for a Fair and Democratic Architecture of Power
Participate in the Drafting and Circulation of the Charter of the Peoples of the Earth
Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development
Low-carbon Economy and Sustainable Development
First Proposals for Building a New World-governance Architecture
Rethinking Global Governance
Marrakech Process for the Protection and Promotion of All Human Rights of Migrants and Persons in Transnational Mobility
A European Way of Security. The Madrid Report on the Human Security Study Group
Governance for Sustainability
Towards a Global Political-Economic Architecture of Environmental Space
Rio+20: Failed Diplomacy, Feeble Democracy
Mobilize and organize to Stop and Prevent Planet Fever!
A new historical moment?
Bringing the Violence of War under Control in a Globalized World
The Bamako Appeal
Dictionary of World Power
The Commons, the State and Transformative Politics
What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?
Cities for All
Inventing a New World Governance Now
The UN Reform and the Alterglobalization Movement
"Biocivilization" for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet. Video on the Workshop
A Proposal for Governance in the Post 2011 World
Call to Multiply the Village of Alternatives
Does Global Governance Ensure That the Global Public Interest Is Served?
Fourteen misconceptions about extraterritorial human rights obligations
China: Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2009
Retrieving and Valuing Other Ethical Pillars: The Concept of Buen Vivir*
Beyond the Growth Paradigm: Creating a Unified Progressive Politics
Global Governance and the Achievement of a Universal Civil Society
Atlanta Declaration and Plan of Action For The Advancement Of The Right Of Access To Information
Global Calling-for-help Center
What South Africa Does the World Need?
Ressentiment* and World Governance
The Challenge of Environmental Governance
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
3rd Dialogue Meeting between civil societies from China, Europe and South America
Rio + ???
An Open Letter to the Commoners and Co-operators of the World
2015 : A turning point to face the climate challenge, exorcise fear and counter the logic of war.
Towards a World Citizens Movement
New York summit is last chance to get consensus on climate before 2015 talks
A War Hiding Another War
Dialog of Chinese, European, and South American Civil Societies at Rio+20
The world ecological crisis and the inability of the international system of states to respond to it demonstrate that the human condition is now universal; more so than ever before. It is driving humanity (“the human race” or “humankind”) to think of itself today as a world community, to form itself into a world society and, like a world nation, to defend its survival and its future collectively.
Humanity is however struggling to see itself as a world community. Consciousness of sharing a common destiny on a global level is not yet sufficiently widespread. Moreover, only the creation of a form of global political power—whatever form it might take—could constitute a world society. In Switzerland, it is the Federal Constitution that created the sense of being Swiss; and it is the European Union that is today creating European identity.
Neither the international system, the contemporary UN system, based on bilateral and multilateral diplomacy, nor the G8 and G20 have proven capable of constituting the minimum institutional structure to allow the implementation of world governance.
The issue is that effective world governance is now indispensable for the survival of humanity on earth, not to mention humankind’s aspirations for liberty, equality, and solidarity or their desire for emancipation.
How can world governance be put into effect? That is the issue of the century, the question we have to undertake to answer. And there is some urgency. Yet we still do not have the theoretical tools to do so, nor the social and political forces necessary to establish the conditions for such governance.
The aim of this paper may appear Utopian and excessively ambitious to some. That is because it is not limited to thinking about the world using existing concepts, and because it is positioned resolutely within a particularly high level of social action, at the universal and world level of humanity. Indeed, the author has chosen to place his theory in a sufficiently long time period to encompass at least the modern era, in a sufficiently wide geographic area to include the planet, and in a sufficiently broad strand of sociology to account for humanity in its universality.
In order to achieve his purpose, the author raises questions that should help to build a new paradigm of thought, which should in turn lead to a new paradigm of action. They are:
- How should we define the difference between the current world and previous worlds?
- How should we define the political format that will facilitate world governance?
- How should we define the movement that would provide a democratic check on world governance?