Citizens’ Reappropriation of Politics
Do Space and Action Have to Be Contradictory? Toward an Inclusive WSF Strategy
On the Road to a Citizens Assembly
Final Declaration of the Sixth World Parliamentary Forum - Caracas 2006
People-centered Global Governance: Making It Happen!
Alterglobalization, a Long-term Process Leading to Alternatives
Global Democracy: Civil Society Visions and Strategies (G05) Conference Report
Civil Society’s Impact on the Multilateral Sphere: Lessons Learned and Future Directions
Can Civil Society Influence G8 Accountability?
Civil Society and the Legitimation of Global Governance
Non-state Actors and World Governance
Contesting Global Governance. Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements
Allende Hoy (English version)
When Dreams Come True
Imagine All the People: Advancing a Global Citizens Movement
Global Civil Society: Shifting Powers in a Shifting World
Capitalism Has Failed: 5 Bold Ways to Build a New World
Can Democracy Survive Interdependence?
Second Meeting of the China, Europe, and South America Dialog Group: Civil Societies Moving Forward for Change
Rediscovering Nelson Mandela for the Twenty-first Century
Statement No. 1
Letter to our readers and to the Mandela World Liberation Front
How to break out the system trap. A model to support conversations for a more strategic activism.
New Rules for New Radicals ? *
Reclaiming the ASEAN Community for the People
The State’s Legitimacy in Fragile Situations
PMCs, Human Security and Global Governance in Global Public Sphere
The UN and World Governance
The Democratic Legitimacy of Public-Private Rule Making: What Can We Learn from the World Comission of Dams?
Final Declaration "Linking Alternatives 2"
After Copenhagen, Some Light on the Horizon
Henceforth, the Keys to the Future are Responsibility, Solidarity, and Courage
Fair Coop, the Earth cooperative for a fair economy
The Commons and World Governance
Governance for Sustainability
What Brazil and What Amazonia Does the World Need?
The UN: Which Reforms for What Future?
The Future of the Commons
World Charter of Free Media
Moving Toward a New World Governance
"Biocivilization" for the Sustainability of Life and of the Planet. Video on the Workshop
New York summit is last chance to get consensus on climate before 2015 talks
Marrakech Process for the Protection and Promotion of All Human Rights of Migrants and Persons in Transnational Mobility
After Rio+20: What New World Governance Does the World Need?
Raising International Climate Finance
Proposal for a Charter of Universal Responsibilities
Persistent corruption in low-income countries requires global action
The Future of Democratic Sovereignty and Transnational Law
Building Consensus on Food Safety Programs among Consumer and Public Health Organizations
Inventing a New World Governance Now
Hearing on Neo-liberal Politics and European Transnational Corporations in Latin America and the Caribbean
Atlanta Declaration and Plan of Action For The Advancement Of The Right Of Access To Information
Proposals for a New World Governance
What Europe does the world need?
A Proposal for Governance in the Post 2011 World
Global Calling-for-help Center
Proposals for a Fair and Democratic Architecture of Power
Seven Leverage Points for the Passage from Economy to Œconomy
Dictionary of World Power
Assemblies emerging in Turkey: a lesson in democracy
Dialog of Chinese, European, and South American Civil Societies at Rio+20
Rio + ???
2015 : A turning point to face the climate challenge, exorcise fear and counter the logic of war.
For a World Citizen Movement
Beyond 2015: Media as Democracy and Development
Transforming Capitalism: the Triple Crisis
Mobilize and organize to Stop and Prevent Planet Fever!
3rd Dialogue Meeting between civil societies from China, Europe and South America
The world ecological crisis and the inability of the international system of states to respond to it demonstrate that the human condition is now universal; more so than ever before. It is driving humanity (“the human race” or “humankind”) to think of itself today as a world community, to form itself into a world society and, like a world nation, to defend its survival and its future collectively.
Humanity is however struggling to see itself as a world community. Consciousness of sharing a common destiny on a global level is not yet sufficiently widespread. Moreover, only the creation of a form of global political power—whatever form it might take—could constitute a world society. In Switzerland, it is the Federal Constitution that created the sense of being Swiss; and it is the European Union that is today creating European identity.
Neither the international system, the contemporary UN system, based on bilateral and multilateral diplomacy, nor the G8 and G20 have proven capable of constituting the minimum institutional structure to allow the implementation of world governance.
The issue is that effective world governance is now indispensable for the survival of humanity on earth, not to mention humankind’s aspirations for liberty, equality, and solidarity or their desire for emancipation.
How can world governance be put into effect? That is the issue of the century, the question we have to undertake to answer. And there is some urgency. Yet we still do not have the theoretical tools to do so, nor the social and political forces necessary to establish the conditions for such governance.
The aim of this paper may appear Utopian and excessively ambitious to some. That is because it is not limited to thinking about the world using existing concepts, and because it is positioned resolutely within a particularly high level of social action, at the universal and world level of humanity. Indeed, the author has chosen to place his theory in a sufficiently long time period to encompass at least the modern era, in a sufficiently wide geographic area to include the planet, and in a sufficiently broad strand of sociology to account for humanity in its universality.
In order to achieve his purpose, the author raises questions that should help to build a new paradigm of thought, which should in turn lead to a new paradigm of action. They are:
- How should we define the difference between the current world and previous worlds?
- How should we define the political format that will facilitate world governance?
- How should we define the movement that would provide a democratic check on world governance?